ANALYSIS OF IDEAL, CLASSIC, AND CONTEMPORARY MUFASSIR IN THE ERA OF SOCIAL MEDIA

Authors

  • Muhammad Azka Putra Difni Kurniawan Insitut Agama Islam Negeri Palangkaraya, Indonesia
  • Akhmad Dasuki Insitut Agama Islam Negeri Palangkaraya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71128/e-gov.v3i4.283

Keywords:

Ideal Mufassir, Classical Tafsir, Contemporary Tafsir, Social Media, Academic Authority.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the existence and role of ideal, classical, and contemporary mufassir (Qur'anic exegetes) in the development of Qur'anic interpretation studies in the era of social media. The research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach, collecting data from various primary and secondary sources related to Qur'anic exegesis. The findings indicate that an ideal mufassir is not only required to master Islamic sciences comprehensively—including Arabic linguistics, Qur'anic sciences (ulūm al-Qur'ān), Hadith, jurisprudence (fiqh), and theology—but must also uphold academic integrity, methodological precision, and high scholarly ethics. Classical mufassir predominantly employed tafsīr bi al-ma'thūr, emphasizing authoritative chains of narration and transmitted reports, while contemporary mufassir developed thematic, sociological, hermeneutical, and contextual approaches in response to modern developments. In the digital era, social media has become a new platform for disseminating Qur'anic interpretation, offering accessibility while simultaneously raising challenges such as oversimplification, the spread of instant interpretations, and the weakening of academic control. Therefore, the existence of ideal mufassir remains crucial to preserve the authenticity, validity, and relevance of Qur'anic interpretation in addressing contemporary religious and social dynamics.

 

 

References

Muhammad Muhammad Ibrahim, Rawậi’ al-Bayận fi Ulûm al-Qur’ận (Mesir: Dar al-Taba’ah Muhammadiyah,

, hlm. 135.

al-Suyuthi, J. (2005). Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Qur'an. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Rahman, F. (1980). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

al-Tabari, M. J. (2000). Jāmiʿ al-bayān ʿan taʾwīl āy al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

Ibn Ashur, M. A. (1984). Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. Tunis: Dar al-Tunisiyya.

Qutb, S. (2003). Fi Zilal al-Qur'an (In the Shade of the Qur'an). Riyadh: International Islamic Publishing House.

Mustaqim, A. (2007). Epistemologi Tafsir Kontemporer-Studi Komparatif antara Fazlur Rahman dan Muhammad

Syahrur. Ringkasan Disertasi, Program Pascasarjan UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. Triana, R. (2019). Desain Penelitian Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir. Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 4(02), 198–215.

Rahman, M. T. (2016b). Rasionalitas Sebagai Basis Tafsir Tekstual (Kajian atas Pemikiran Muhammad Asad). Al

Bayan: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 1(1), 63–70.

Muhammad Sofyan, ‘Tafsir Wal Mufassirun’, 2015, pp. 1–104.

Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi, ‘Ilmu Dan Syarat Yang Harus Dimiliki Mufassir’, Metode Penelitian Tafsir, July, 2023, pp. 55–63.

Setio Budi, ‘Implementasi Syarat-Syarat Mufassir Di Era Digital’, Al-Mutsla, 3.1 (2021), pp. 9–17, doi:10.46870/jstain.v3i1.42.

Agus Salim Hasanudin and Eni Zulaiha, ‘Hakikat Tafsir Menurut Para Mufassir’, Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas, 2.2 (2022), pp. 203–10, doi:10.15575/jis.v2i2.18318.

al-Dzahabi, M. H. (1976). Al-Tafsir wa al-Mufassirun (Vol. 1-3). Cairo: Maktabah Wahbah.

Imam Masrur, ‘Telaah Kritis Syarat Mufassir Abad Ke-21’, Qof, 2.2 (2018), pp. 196–97.

Published

2025-11-28

How to Cite

Putra Difni Kurniawan, M. A., & Dasuki, A. D. (2025). ANALYSIS OF IDEAL, CLASSIC, AND CONTEMPORARY MUFASSIR IN THE ERA OF SOCIAL MEDIA. Journal Education and Government Wiyata, 3(4), 733–741. https://doi.org/10.71128/e-gov.v3i4.283